Microsoft gave brand safety advertising a scalpel, not a sledgehammer
Website exclusion lists ban a whole address. Content exclusions ban a whole topic. This new control bans a single sentence in a page title, and that precision is the whole point.
By Katie Delaney · 2026-08-14 · 7 min read
What excluded content terms actually block#

A careful fox does not avoid an entire hedgerow because one bramble in it stung once. It learns exactly which branch to sidestep, keeps its den close to the good ground, and walks the rest of the trail undisturbed. Brand safety advertising has needed that kind of precision for years, and Microsoft's new excluded content terms control finally lets it work at that resolution rather than the blunt all-or-nothing choice advertisers have prowled around until now.
The feature blocks your ads from showing next to page titles containing terms you specify, at the account or campaign level, with a maximum of 1,000 terms, according to Microsoft's own Advertising API documentation. Terms added at the campaign level automatically apply account-wide, so the control is meant to be set once and left running rather than managed per campaign. It is one of the more useful brand safety advertising tools any major platform has shipped this year, precisely because it is narrow rather than sweeping.
Where brand safety advertising reaches, and where it does not#
Microsoft's documentation confirms the feature is available for Audience, Performance Max, Search and Shopping campaigns, with a plain note that Premium Streaming campaigns are not supported yet. Search Engine Land's coverage of the rollout notes it is arriving gradually rather than to every account at once, echoed by ppc.land's reporting on the same launch. A third writeup, from ZoomYourTraffic, confirms the same 1,000-term cap and the same gradual rollout pattern.
Blocks an entire site
Set at the account, campaign or ad group level, this stops ads appearing on specific domains regardless of the page's actual content.
Blocks a specific page title
New in August 2026, this scans page titles for up to 1,000 chosen terms and blocks only the matching pages, leaving the rest of an otherwise safe site untouched.
Sitting between those two is content exclusions, a third layer that blocks entire sensitive categories such as adult, gambling or violence content, delivered through Microsoft's partnership with Integral Ad Science and automatically applied by default against medium and high-risk placements, per the same Microsoft Learn documentation. Microsoft's companion guide on exclusions covers how the three layers combine at the campaign and ad group level.
Why this is a real lever, not a footnote#
Most brand safety advertising controls force an advertiser to choose between two blunt instruments: exclude a whole website, or exclude a whole content category and lose reach across every page that merely touches the topic. Excluded content terms sits between those, and that middle setting is what makes brand safety advertising genuinely useful rather than decorative. The industry's own definitional guidance on the concept, summarised on Wikipedia's brand safety entry, has long framed the discipline as a trade-off between reach and risk, and this feature is one of the first mainstream tools to genuinely narrow that trade-off rather than just restate it.
The example Microsoft gives in its own documentation is instructive: exclude the term "faulty tech devices" as a seller of tech products, and your ads stop appearing next to any page titled around that phrase, without you having to exclude the entire publication that ran the story. That is the precision advertisers in regulated or reputation-sensitive categories have been asking platforms for, and it sits inside the broader microsoft advertising policy toolkit alongside website exclusion lists and content exclusions.
The negative keyword targeting parallel worth knowing#
Advertisers who already use negative keyword targeting to stop their ads triggering on the wrong search query will recognise the logic immediately. Excluded content terms applies the same exclude-by-phrase thinking to where an ad can appear, rather than to which query fired it, and the two controls now sit alongside each other in the same account-level toolkit.
Five moves for brand safety teams this quarter#
None of this requires a platform migration. It requires someone to actually build the list, and most advertisers have not yet.
Go to Tools > Content suitability > Excluded content terms in Microsoft Advertising. The gradual rollout means some accounts see it and some do not yet.
Start from any past placement you have actually flagged as unsuitable, rather than guessing at terms in the abstract.
Campaign-level terms cascade account-wide anyway, so set your baseline list once centrally and layer campaign-specific terms only where genuinely needed.
Review both lists together. A term worth excluding from where your ad appears is often worth excluding from what triggers it too.
Because the feature is shipping gradually, revisit whether it has reached your account and whether Microsoft has raised the term cap or extended coverage to Premium Streaming.
Do not confuse the tools' names across accounts#
Microsoft's own documentation flags that some advertisers see content exclusions labelled as excluded content themes inside Microsoft Advertising Platform, a naming inconsistency worth checking before a team assumes a feature is missing when it is simply named differently in their interface. ALM Corp's implementation guide and the Dutch-language walkthrough at ADoptimizr both flag the same naming quirk for teams working across regions.
Measuring a control that is designed to be invisible#
A working exclusion list produces no headline metric. Its success shows up as an absence: the placement report that never had to be escalated, the client call that never had to happen.
Maximum excluded content terms per Microsoft Advertising account
The best brand safety control is the report that never gets written, because the placement never happened.
Track it anyway, the way a fox marks its own scent along a trail it means to walk again. Log every placement escalation you would previously have filed manually, and compare the count before and after your excluded content terms list goes live. A falling count over two or three months is the real evidence the control is working, even though the platform itself will not surface that comparison for you. Optimixed's coverage of the Performance Max side of this rollout makes the same case for treating it as a living list rather than a one-off task, and Microsoft's own guide to adding terms during Performance Max campaign creation confirms the setting is meant to be revisited each time a campaign is built, not just at account setup.
Set the list once, then treat it the way you treat a negative keyword list: reviewed quarterly, not forgotten after the first setup. Optimixed's coverage of the Performance Max side of this rollout makes the same case for treating it as a living list rather than a one-off task.
One question worth asking your account team#
Ask Microsoft directly whether Premium Streaming coverage has a stated timeline, since that gap is the single biggest reason a video-led brand safety advertising strategy cannot yet rely on this control alone.
If your account needs a proper brand safety review across every platform, not just Microsoft's, that is the audit folkfox PPC and paid search runs, alongside the same platform-literacy work behind our paid social and brand strategy services.
Frequently asked questions#
What is excluded content terms in Microsoft Advertising?
Excluded content terms is a brand safety advertising control that blocks your ads from appearing next to page titles containing specific words or phrases you choose, up to 1,000 terms per account, across Audience, Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns.
How is content suitability different from a website exclusion list?
Content suitability includes three separate controls: website exclusion lists block an entire site, content exclusions block whole sensitive categories, and excluded content terms blocks only page titles matching specific phrases, leaving the rest of a site's pages eligible.
Does brand safety advertising on Microsoft cost extra?
No. Excluded content terms is a free account-level setting inside Microsoft Advertising, managed through Tools > Content suitability, not a paid add-on or separate product.
Is negative keyword targeting the same as excluded content terms?
No. Negative keyword targeting stops your ad triggering on specific search queries, while excluded content terms stops your ad appearing next to specific page titles in placements. They solve different problems and work well used together.
Which Microsoft Advertising campaign types support excluded content terms?
Audience, Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns support the feature at launch. Premium Streaming campaigns are not yet supported, according to Microsoft's own documentation.
Read more on this topic#
Google is about to restate your numbers, and the drop never happened
This morning's companion piece on a platform reporting change with the same read-the-fine-print discipline.
Read the pieceMeta Ads Reporting Just Went Quiet, and Nobody Sent a Memo
Another platform quietly changing what advertisers can see and control, from the paid social side.
Read the pieceMeta built a list you can only say no with
A parallel exclusion-only control on Meta, useful context for how platforms are building narrower brand safety tools.
Read the pieceMeta put its prices up 20 per cent in North America and nobody blinked
Benchmark data for teams weighing where to invest brand safety attention across paid media budgets.
Read the piece
Ready for a brand safety audit that actually uses the controls platforms give you?
folkfox builds and maintains brand safety advertising controls across Microsoft, Google and Meta, so exclusion lists get used, not just switched on once and forgotten.